Wednesday, 14 March 2012

$38 million please

The Western Australian State Government has recently released a draft of the Western Australian Bicycle Network Plan 2012 - 2021. It has been a long time coming. The last version was done in 1996 and was meant to be reviewed in 2000. 

I am pleased that there are signs of progress but I am also underwhelmed with the content. Most of the proposals are obvious. Did it really take sixteen years to produce this? There are a few too many references to doing more "reviews" and things like a "strategic and operational development plan".

Another worrying aspect is that there is no money allocated yet to do the work. The plan shows an intention to increase the spending on the Principal Shared Paths from $0.91 million to $10.91 million per year and the overall spending is planned to be about $16.7 million per year. At first this seems like a lot of money but it represents only 1.39% of the Western Australian budget for roads.

I will be thankful if all of the proposals are implemented but I think we need to have higher expectations. If we are to achieve the goal of doubling the number of people cycling in Australia by 2016 as described in the Australian Government's National Cycling Strategy we need to move faster and have more money and resources directed to bicycle infrastructure.

Here is an idea. The modal share for bicycles is 1.6% (2009 figure) and if our aim is to double this to 3.2% then we should have 3.2% of the road budget allocated to bicycles. This is a small percentage, not much to ask for really. 

The current Western Australian state budget for roads is $1.2 billion per annum which would mean $38.4 million per annum for bicycles. With this amount we could actually get things moving.

Another idea. Given that we all know the obvious health benefits associated with cycling, perhaps we could divert a tiny amount from the Western Australian health budget. 

Call it preventative medicine. We should not dare to ask for much, we all know that the hospitals are struggling. How about just a quarter of one percent? 

The Western Australian health budget this year is $6,217,600,000 that would give bicycles another $15.5 million.


  1. YOu have raised some interesting points about the amounts which I hope you don't mind if I decided to incorporate into my submission on the plan. Keep up the good work.

  2. While I agree wholeheartedly about the health benefits of cycling and the rest of your points, I cannot agree that the health budget should be tapped - the amounts ( and more ) should rather come out of roads and also out of the budget for refurbishment of colin barnetts offices. Another suggestion is to take it out of the subsidies that flow toward coal companies, mining companies - all who pillage the earth for profit that further increases our emissions while as cyclists we offset them.

    1. Yes, you are right. We should not mess about with the health budget. I have another idea. It means going national. There is some money being spent on defence. Quite a bit actually. If we could have a just a wafer-thin slice it would really help. Only 0.00078% of the $19,799,000,000 would get us that extra $15m. They probably wouldn’t even miss it. ...But lets take Colin's office as well.

  3. Great analysis.

    Troy spoke about a five-fold increase during the life of the „strategy“. Makes the $50mio I keep asking for looking puny…

  4. @Ant I think has a fair point about leaving the health budget alone ... balancing the road funding is a better idea.

  5. Interesting. It's good to see that the government is at least thinking/talking about bike improvements, but it is frustrating when there is more talk than action. I agree that an equal allocation of transportation funds to bicycling based on percentages would make a huge difference. The US has that same imbalance.